Translate

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Isu SELCAT: satu lakonan?



Mampukah MB Selangor ini mendesiplinkan Penjawat Awam di Selangor?

Dewan Pemuda PAS pusat memberi amaran kerajaan Negeri Selangor pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat bahawa Selangor "boleh tumbang seandainya kakitangan awam terus diaibkan dan mereka mula membenci pemerintah" berikutan tatacara Jawatankuasa Pilihan Khas Mengenai Keupayaan, Kebertanggungjawaban dan Ketelusan Dewan Undangan Negeri Selangor (Selcat). Manakala PAS Pusat pula dikatakan sedang menimbangkan tindakan yang lebih keras terhadap Pesuruhjaya PAS Negeri Selangor, Y.B. Dr. Hassan Ali, di atas kelantangannya secara terbuka mempersoalkan tindak tanduk Selcat termasuk kebertanggungjawaban dan ketelusan badan itu apabila ianya hanya dikuasai oleh pemimpin politik Pakatan Rakyat.

Pakatan Rakyat yang selama ini mencanangkan badan bebas lebih jelas TIDAK melakukan apa yang mereka katakan, war-warkan dan perjuangkan. Campurtangan Selcat dalam urusan pentadbiran awam, dianggap keterlaluan oleh penjawat awam jelas memadamkan gagasan kebebasan yang PR Perjuangkan. Dengan ini mulalah sektor awam mempersoal kewibawaan PR untuk membentuk dan mengurus tadbir negara. Jelaslah bahawa apabila system dan peraturan umum yang selama ini menjadi peraturan dan norma pentadbiran dan terbukti berjaya diketepikan maka kekecamukan yang menimbulkan kebencian rakyat pasti akan timbul.

Pemuda PAS dan Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor sudah tidak sehaluan dan PAS Pusat berkait isu Selcat dan tidak tanduknya. Selcat pula dipengerusi Speaker Selangor dari DAP yang pernah popular mencampakkan "peraturan Mesyuarat" DUN Selangor ke dalam tong sampah. Oleh itu kewibawaanya sebagai pengerusi sendiri dipersoal dalam melaksanakan urustadbir dan system mengikut peraturan. PAS pula tersepit dalam dilema antara mempertahankan DAP sebagai rakan Pakatan atau terpaksa mengorbankan pemimpinnya sendiri demi keutuhan Pakatan Rakyat. Dalam masa yang sama, rakyat terus mempersoal perjuangan PAS dan idelogi perjuangannya. Apakah PAS tergamak mengorbankan Pemimpinnya sendiri semata-mata menjaga hati DAP atau menegakkan dasar perjuangan PAS?

Segelintir masyarakat sudah membuat andaian bahawa perangai dan sikap ini hanyalah satu lakunan tpemimpin politik terutama apabila menjelang pilihanraya kecil seperti Bagan Pinang, Negri Sembilan, PAS cuba memperlihatkan tentangannya terhadap tindak tanduk dan dasar-dasar DAP dan pegangannya terhadap prinsip perjuangan PAS diperketat sebagai daya tarikan dan gambaran terhadap sokongan pengundi Melayu terhadap calon Pakatan Rakyat dari PAS. Apakah cara dan pendekatan ini mampu untuk mengabui mata rakyat? Atau rakyat mula menghidunya sebagai lakonan?

Bila Dr Hassan Ali dan Azmin Ali (bukan adik beradik) diwar-warkan sebagai YB di Selangor yang bakal menggugat kedudukan Menteri Besar, YAB Abdul Khalid bin Ibrahim, keadaan ini sudah mula menjadi tekanan kepada Pakatan Rakyat Selangor. Kerajaan Selangor sudah mula goyah. Meraka dihantui kejatuhan dan keruntuhan seperti yang telah terjadi dengan Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat di Perak.

Tidak kurang penganalisa politik yang melihat bahawa era ini merupakan buat pertama kali rakyat Malaysia memberi kepercayaan dan mandat kepada "Pembangkang" melalui PRU 12. Oleh itu, tindak tanduk pembangkang, Pakatan Rakyat, yang tidak menampakkan permuafakatan dan kesepakatan yang matang sudah mula menyingkap keraguan rakyat terhadap kredibiliti dan akauntabiliti PR sebagai kerajaan. Keadaan di 4 negeri dalam Malaysia tidak banyak berubah malah mengalami kemerosotan. Sehingga kini rakyat sudah mula dan meneruskan penimbang taraan. Tidak mutshil rakyat akan menarik semula mandat ini menjelang PRU 13 atas dasar ketidak yakinan dan hilang kepercayaan.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Israel pressured on nuclear sites



Israel has never confirmed or denied whether it
has nuclear weapons

The UN nuclear assembly has called for Israel to open its nuclear facilities to UN inspection and sign up to the non-proliferation treaty. The resolution, which was passed narrowly on Friday, marked a surprise victory for Arab states and others who have pushed for the move for the last 18 years. The non-binding resolution voiced concern about "Israeli nuclear capabilities" and urged the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, to tackle the issue.

Israel vowed it would not co-operate, saying the measure singled it out while many of its neighbours remained hostile to its existence. "Israel will not co-operate in any matter with this resolution which is only aiming at reinforcing political hostilities and lines of division in the Middle East region," said David Danieli, the chief Israeli delegate.

'Glorious moment'

Israel is one of only three countries worldwide - along with India and Pakistan - outside the non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and is widely assumed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal.It has never confirmed nor denied that it has nuclear weapons.Ali Asghar Soltanieh, the Iranian ambassador, whose country's disputed nuclear programme is under IAEA investigation, said the vote was a "glorious moment" and "a triumph for the oppressed nation of Palestine".

Speaking later to Al Jazeera, Soltanieh said: "All like-minded, peace-loving countries have always called for a resolution to take measures to push Israel to stop their nuclear weapon programme and adhere to the NPT and put every nuclear installation under the IAEA.

"All countries in the Middle East are party to the NPT - the only non-party is Israel ... the resolution was addressed to the only non-participatory [state] in the Middle East.Tehran was one of the 21 countries sponsoring the measure.Iran absorbed a setback later when its bid to make legally binding a 1991 resolution banning attacks on nuclear sites failed to win a consensus from the bloc of Non-Aligned Movement developing nations and so was not brought up for a vote.

UN Security Council members Russia and China backed the Israel resolution, passed by a 49-45 margin by the IAEA's annual member states gathering. There were 16 abstentions.Western states said it was unfair and counterproductive to isolate one member state and that an IAEA resolution passed on Thursday, which urged all Middle East nations including Israel to foreswear atomic bombs, made Friday's proposal unnecessary.

Western backing

Before the vote, Glyn Davies, the US ambassador, said the resolution was "redundant ... such an approach is highly politicised and does not address the complexities at play regarding crucial nuclear-related issues in the Middle East".Canada tried to block a vote on the floor with a "no-action motion", a procedural manoeuvre that prevailed in 2007 and 2008, but lost by an eight-vote margin. Diplomats from the non-aligned movement of developing nations said times had changed with the advent of the US administration of Barack Obama, the US president.

"People and countries are bolder now, willing to call a spade a spade. You cannot hide or ignore the truth, the double standards, of Israel's nuclear capability forever," the Reuters news agency quoted one diplomat as saying."The new US administration has certainly helped this thinking with its commitment to universal nuclear disarmament and nuclear weapons-free zones."The non-binding measure was last voted on in 1991, when IAEA membership was much smaller, and passed by 39-31.

AL-JAZEERA

Sunday, September 20, 2009

SELAMAT HARI RAYA AIDILFITRI



Sempena Hari yang mulia ini, saya mengucapkan Selamat Hari Raya Aidilfitri buat kaum Muslimin dan Muslimat di mana jua berada. Dengan ingatan tulus ikhlas maaf Zahir dan Batin.